Page 13 |
Previous | 13 of 28 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
|
This page
All
|
Our Goal, Ten Projects Information and Statistics
Our original goal was for ten projects,
but when we discovered how modest
some of the requests were we found that
we had funds to cover 19 ( nineteen) 3.
Seven of these were for the Fall Season,
July to December 1991. Twelve were
Spring projects, January to June 1992.
Fall projects included 19 families and 43
children. Spring projects served 44
families and 106 children. This totals 63
families and 149 children. There is
some minor overlap because 2 of the
Fall projects reorganized, added
participants and qualified for Spring.
The project size varied but an average
unit involved 3 to 5 families and 9 to 12
children. Fourteen of the nineteen
projects continue to function without
our financial assistance.
Participants' Responsibility
Participants' responsibility was to keep
accurate records of hours and wages
and, at the close of their project, to
present signed time sheets and a written
evaluation. No subsidy was paid until
this requirement was met. Successful
luncheons and workshops were held
after each project period thus offering
the participants a chance to exchange
ideas and concerns.
Information and statistics from the
evaluations.
19 Projects
63 Families
149 Children
Participants were from many types of
farms. There were mixed farms
( livestock and grain), mixed grain,
commercial cattle, purebred cattle, hogs,
poultry, vegetables, hay, dairy,
hydroponic vegetables, sheep and cow/
calf operations.
Twelve projects came i n substantially
under budget. Six projects were on
budget or very slightly below. One
project did not materialize and received
no funding. N o project asked for, or
received, more than originally allotted.
Community Support
Many organizations were verbally
supportive but offered no deeper
commitment. In this category were,
Agricultural Societies, Recreation
Boards, Women's Groups, Health Units,
Town Offices, Local Day Care Centres,
Hire- A- Student and School Divisions.
There were exceptions in one or two
FCSS ( Family and Community Support
Services) organizations, and some of the
District Home Economists.
3. See Appendix 3
Alberta Rural Child Care Pilot Project
Page 4
Object Description
| Rating | |
| Title | Rural Child Care Project |
| Subject | Projects; Child Care; Rural; AWI |
| Description | The Alberta Rural Child Care Pilot Project 1991-1992 |
| Language | en |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Type | text |
| Source | Alberta Women's Institutes |
| Identifier | awi0811104 |
| Date | 1992 |
| Collection | Alberta Women's Institutes - Collective Memory |
| Repository | AU Digital Library |
| Copyright | For Private Study and Research Use Only |
Description
| Title | Page 13 |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | AWI Collection |
| Collection | Alberta Women's Institutes - Collective Memory |
| Repository | AU Digital Library |
| Copyright | For Private Study and Research Use Only |
| Transcript | Our Goal, Ten Projects Information and Statistics Our original goal was for ten projects, but when we discovered how modest some of the requests were we found that we had funds to cover 19 ( nineteen) 3. Seven of these were for the Fall Season, July to December 1991. Twelve were Spring projects, January to June 1992. Fall projects included 19 families and 43 children. Spring projects served 44 families and 106 children. This totals 63 families and 149 children. There is some minor overlap because 2 of the Fall projects reorganized, added participants and qualified for Spring. The project size varied but an average unit involved 3 to 5 families and 9 to 12 children. Fourteen of the nineteen projects continue to function without our financial assistance. Participants' Responsibility Participants' responsibility was to keep accurate records of hours and wages and, at the close of their project, to present signed time sheets and a written evaluation. No subsidy was paid until this requirement was met. Successful luncheons and workshops were held after each project period thus offering the participants a chance to exchange ideas and concerns. Information and statistics from the evaluations. 19 Projects 63 Families 149 Children Participants were from many types of farms. There were mixed farms ( livestock and grain), mixed grain, commercial cattle, purebred cattle, hogs, poultry, vegetables, hay, dairy, hydroponic vegetables, sheep and cow/ calf operations. Twelve projects came i n substantially under budget. Six projects were on budget or very slightly below. One project did not materialize and received no funding. N o project asked for, or received, more than originally allotted. Community Support Many organizations were verbally supportive but offered no deeper commitment. In this category were, Agricultural Societies, Recreation Boards, Women's Groups, Health Units, Town Offices, Local Day Care Centres, Hire- A- Student and School Divisions. There were exceptions in one or two FCSS ( Family and Community Support Services) organizations, and some of the District Home Economists. 3. See Appendix 3 Alberta Rural Child Care Pilot Project Page 4 |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 13
