Page 13 |
Previous | 13 of 28 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
|
This page
All
|
Our Goal, Ten Projects Information and Statistics Our original goal was for ten projects, but when we discovered how modest some of the requests were we found that we had funds to cover 19 ( nineteen) 3. Seven of these were for the Fall Season, July to December 1991. Twelve were Spring projects, January to June 1992. Fall projects included 19 families and 43 children. Spring projects served 44 families and 106 children. This totals 63 families and 149 children. There is some minor overlap because 2 of the Fall projects reorganized, added participants and qualified for Spring. The project size varied but an average unit involved 3 to 5 families and 9 to 12 children. Fourteen of the nineteen projects continue to function without our financial assistance. Participants' Responsibility Participants' responsibility was to keep accurate records of hours and wages and, at the close of their project, to present signed time sheets and a written evaluation. No subsidy was paid until this requirement was met. Successful luncheons and workshops were held after each project period thus offering the participants a chance to exchange ideas and concerns. Information and statistics from the evaluations. 19 Projects 63 Families 149 Children Participants were from many types of farms. There were mixed farms ( livestock and grain), mixed grain, commercial cattle, purebred cattle, hogs, poultry, vegetables, hay, dairy, hydroponic vegetables, sheep and cow/ calf operations. Twelve projects came i n substantially under budget. Six projects were on budget or very slightly below. One project did not materialize and received no funding. N o project asked for, or received, more than originally allotted. Community Support Many organizations were verbally supportive but offered no deeper commitment. In this category were, Agricultural Societies, Recreation Boards, Women's Groups, Health Units, Town Offices, Local Day Care Centres, Hire- A- Student and School Divisions. There were exceptions in one or two FCSS ( Family and Community Support Services) organizations, and some of the District Home Economists. 3. See Appendix 3 Alberta Rural Child Care Pilot Project Page 4
Object Description
Rating | |
Title | Rural Child Care Project |
Subject | Projects; Child Care; Rural; AWI |
Description | The Alberta Rural Child Care Pilot Project 1991-1992 |
Language | en |
Format | application/pdf |
Type | text |
Source | Alberta Women's Institutes |
Identifier | awi0811104 |
Date | 1992 |
Collection | Alberta Women's Institutes - Collective Memory |
Repository | AU Digital Library |
Copyright | For Private Study and Research Use Only |
Description
Title | Page 13 |
Format | application/pdf |
Source | AWI Collection |
Collection | Alberta Women's Institutes - Collective Memory |
Repository | AU Digital Library |
Copyright | For Private Study and Research Use Only |
Transcript | Our Goal, Ten Projects Information and Statistics Our original goal was for ten projects, but when we discovered how modest some of the requests were we found that we had funds to cover 19 ( nineteen) 3. Seven of these were for the Fall Season, July to December 1991. Twelve were Spring projects, January to June 1992. Fall projects included 19 families and 43 children. Spring projects served 44 families and 106 children. This totals 63 families and 149 children. There is some minor overlap because 2 of the Fall projects reorganized, added participants and qualified for Spring. The project size varied but an average unit involved 3 to 5 families and 9 to 12 children. Fourteen of the nineteen projects continue to function without our financial assistance. Participants' Responsibility Participants' responsibility was to keep accurate records of hours and wages and, at the close of their project, to present signed time sheets and a written evaluation. No subsidy was paid until this requirement was met. Successful luncheons and workshops were held after each project period thus offering the participants a chance to exchange ideas and concerns. Information and statistics from the evaluations. 19 Projects 63 Families 149 Children Participants were from many types of farms. There were mixed farms ( livestock and grain), mixed grain, commercial cattle, purebred cattle, hogs, poultry, vegetables, hay, dairy, hydroponic vegetables, sheep and cow/ calf operations. Twelve projects came i n substantially under budget. Six projects were on budget or very slightly below. One project did not materialize and received no funding. N o project asked for, or received, more than originally allotted. Community Support Many organizations were verbally supportive but offered no deeper commitment. In this category were, Agricultural Societies, Recreation Boards, Women's Groups, Health Units, Town Offices, Local Day Care Centres, Hire- A- Student and School Divisions. There were exceptions in one or two FCSS ( Family and Community Support Services) organizations, and some of the District Home Economists. 3. See Appendix 3 Alberta Rural Child Care Pilot Project Page 4 |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 13